|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- The changing landscape of philanthropy
- Increased need for accountability
- Demonstrate how projects will help meet goals
- Provide a source of information to assist with grant monitoring
- Desire to help organizations build capacity
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Challenge results in discovery
- Matrix worked with this one project - would it work with others?
- Strategy for project readiness to become involved
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- OTTER- Older Teachers Training Early Readers
- Culture Change Coaching Project
- “Wisdom Works” Meaningful Service
& Employment
- Winter Park Public Library Lifelong Learning Institute
- Community Partnerships for Senior Services
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- OTTER is a community based program designed to meet the universal Pre-K
standards and principles for the State of Florida.
|
|
11
|
- Adult volunteers 50+ are trained to work on reading readiness skills
with four-year-old children.
- Volunteers are placed in school-based, community-based and faith-based
sites with pre-kindergarten programs.
- Volunteers spend a minimum 1 hour per week working with children
one-on-one, in small groups or with the entire class.
- Activities center on reading aloud, oral language and listening, letter
and sound knowledge, phonemic awareness and emergent writing.
|
|
12
|
- To create intergenerational programs in Orange County, Florida that
assist children to enter kindergarten ready to read by engaging older
adults as an integral and valued part of a learning team.
- Our program encompasses these values:
- – Sharing Knowledge
- – Recognizing Competencies
- – Showing Respect
- – Embracing Unconditional Acceptance
- – Providing a Safe and Secure Environment
|
|
13
|
- Measure effectiveness of program on children.
- Building vocabulary
- Exposure to Books
- Comprehension
- Desire to Read
- Appreciation of intergenerational relationships
- Measure effectiveness of program on volunteers.
- Personal well being
- Training
- Meaningful service
|
|
14
|
- New baselines will be established in August/September at the beginning
of each school year.
|
|
15
|
- Program has completed 1 year in four different sites.
- Volunteers will resume activity at the start of the new school year.
- Matrix data from the first year has been collected and entered.
- Matrix data will again be collected in September 2005, December 2005 and
April 2006.
- Wording in the Matrix has been edited to better facilitate data
collection.
|
|
16
|
- The children appreciate the intergenerational relationships.
- Volunteers effectively engage children in reading readiness activities.
- The program enhances the volunteers personal well being.
- The matching and placement criteria needs to better reflect the interest
of the volunteer.
|
|
17
|
- Indicators need to be well defined.
- Status levels need to be personalized and tailored to the participants.
- Determine how and from whom data will be collected.
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- The philosophy of the Florida Pioneer Network is
- To promote improvement in the quality of life and work in long-term care
in the state of Florida. Our goals are to create a statewide culture
change network that:
- Encourages and supports individuals and organizations to be involved in
the culture change journey;
- Offers opportunities for education about culture change/Pioneer
practices;
- Fosters communication among long-term care facilities and programs to
share “best practices”;
- Educates local and state officials, regulators, surveyors, the general
public and the community about culture change in long-term care.
|
|
20
|
- The Culture Change in Long-term Care Matrix is being used in the culture
change coaching project to assess where each of three facilities is on
their culture change journey, determine next steps for implementing
culture change (Pioneer) practices, assess progress along the way and
continually improve the home’s programs and environment.
|
|
21
|
- The goal is to improve the quality of life and work in each facility.
The matrix will be used as a tool to inform funders, surveyors, other
facilities, current and potential residents and families and other key
stakeholders about the outcomes of the home’s culture change efforts.
|
|
22
|
- Administrators from each of the three facilities and FPN steering
committee members met to develop the categories and status level
indicators for the culture change in long-term care matrix.
- Status level indicator names were changed as follows:
- Thriving = Blooming
- Stable = Budding
- At-Risk
- In-crisis = Dormant
- FPN culture change coaches had worked with each facility to develop
their vision and values statements for their culture change journeys.
|
|
23
|
- The culture change in long-term care matrix has been administered to the
staff in each facility. One facility had 131 staff members complete the
survey. The other two facilities are currently having staff complete the
survey.
- A report was given to the one facility and they are currently using that
information to determine next steps. The first step they are taking is
to establish neighborhoods within the larger facility to which each
staff member is assigned (staff are choosing their neighborhood to the
extent possible). The culture change coaches will be providing
leadership/team development training to facility staff to facilitate
culture change.
|
|
24
|
- Matrix results for the nursing home include the following:
- Facility practices, which stood out as exemplary were as follows:
- Town Hall meetings are being held to keep all members of the community
informed of on-going activities in the home;
- Residents and staff interact with guests/visitors to the home;
- Risk management/Quality Assessment and Assurance programs are in place,
consistently implemented and annually reviewed and approved resulting in
positive outcomes;
- Residents feel they are safe, secure and that they are important to the
facility community and perceive staff as part of their extended family.*
- *This is the staff’s perception; residents and families will also be
surveyed.
|
|
25
|
- Facility practices which stood out as needing improvement were as
follows:
- The dining program meets regulatory requirements with alternative menus
only.
- Empowerment of staff, recruitment and retention, dignity and emotional
well-being staff needs work;
- Frontline staff do not routinely participate in the care planning
process.
- In-service program meets regulatory requirements only.
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Implementation of a “One Stop” Senior Coaching Program model which
provides peer coaching/mentoring to seniors seeking employment and/or
volunteer service opportunities.
- Guidance increases opportunities for success through better preparation
and matching.
- Provision of “job club” training tailored specifically for seniors to
increase confidence and skills to obtain employment.
|
|
28
|
- To Measure:
- Recruitment Effectiveness
- Matching Effectiveness
- Diversity of Participants
- Relationships between partners, coach & applicant, program &
organizations
- Client satisfaction
- Increase in client’s well being
|
|
29
|
- Vision - Create and sustain employment and volunteer service
opportunities for the mutual benefit of older adults and organizations
throughout the community.
- Goal - Develop effective, accessible programs for Orange County
(Florida), resulting in gainful employment and/or meaningful service
that improve productivity and return on investment for all.
|
|
30
|
- Initial Matrix evaluation tool was established prior to any specific
program planning. Only the
program concept was in place.
- Due to the complexity of the program, tool may be revised as program
variables, such as partnership roles, coaching roles, and client service
guidelines are firmly established.
|
|
31
|
- What’s the status of the program now?
- Currently planning program details
- Coaches have been recruited - (3 of 6 identified)
- Conducted a Focus group of major employers
- Where are you in the Matrix process and what’s next?
- Creating data collection method/process
- Beginning to assess early activities
|
|
32
|
- It is important to think through your project thoroughly before
developing the Matrix tool.
- A highly complex project in its conceptual phase is more challenging
than applying the tool to an existing concept.
- Finally, during the development of the Matrix tool it is important to
have consistent participation from the people participating in the
development.
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Adult Education department of the Winter Park Public Library
- Established January 2003
- Expanded January 2004 to include “Sage-ing” and “Spellbinders”
- Other tracks include: Art & Literature, Health & Wellness,
History & Current Events, How to …
- Institute Council serves as Advisory Group
|
|
35
|
- To provide:
- A “roadmap” for the Institute
- Easily identify results and program outcomes
- A means of accountability
- Aid in strategic planning and continuous quality improvement
|
|
36
|
- Vision: To be the leader in participant-centered learning
- Mission: To improve the lives of Winter Park residents and the
surrounding community.
|
|
37
|
- At the beginning, the Institute was…
- Still transitioning from Sage-ing to Vital Living
- Adjusting to key staff change
- Institute Council members beginning to disconnect
|
|
38
|
- And now…
- Council members revitalized and re-engaged
- Potential new members eager to participate
- Currently completing validation
- Preparing for implementation in Fall ’05
|
|
39
|
- This is an intentional process that requires commitment from managers,
staff and community advocates.
- Matrix Outcomes Evaluation compels participants to define the “playing
field” and its boundaries;
- The outcome is well-worth the input!
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- The purpose of the CPSS project is to lay the groundwork for
transforming the system of service delivery to older adults and their
caregivers in our community.
- This is being accomplished by…
|
|
42
|
- Identifying and profiling all service providers, both non-profit and for
profit, and making this information readily available to all consumers
- Increasing the capacity of non-profit service providers to serve more
consumers by helping them build their business skills and devise
strategies for expanding their services to all consumers
- Developing a fee structure that offers options and choice to all
consumers, regardless of their ability to pay
|
|
43
|
- The Matrix Outcomes Evaluation process:
- Will enable us to monitor our progress throughout project
implementation, so that appropriate adjustments can be made and
successes can be documented
- Provides a vehicle for input from all stakeholder groups and a means to collect
feedback from stakeholders throughout the project and in the future
|
|
44
|
- Goal: for all segments of the elder services network to work together to
improve the long-term care system and to better meet the needs of the
growing number of older adults in our community.
|
|
45
|
- FL has the highest percentage of seniors in the nation.
- The Senior Resource Alliance was chosen as the first Aging &
Disability Resource Center in the state of FL.
- SRA serves the four-county area of Central FL which has a reputation for
outstanding service delivery through our network of provider agencies.
- Shrinking dollars and changes at the state and federal level require
creative solutions to maintain service delivery at current levels.
- Serving an increasing number of seniors, at all income levels, requires
a transformational change in the way we and our providers do business.
|
|
46
|
- The CPSS project has been in the planning for over a year and began in
earnest in February 2005.
- In April we assembled a sizable group, representing all stakeholder
groups, to begin designing our Matrix evaluation tool.
- The group identified Vision, Values and Leadership Roles, as well as
categories and some indicators. The four categories identified were:
- Communication, Collaboration,
- Person-Centered Care System, Fee Structure
- The evaluation tool will be completed over the summer and the first data
collected in August.
|
|
47
|
- With a lot of pre-planning and Jerry Endres’ leadership, we were able to
make an excellent start in one day.
- By including representatives of all stakeholders—providers, funders,
payers, consumers & caregivers—we were able to gain consensus on the
vision for where we need to go and strategies for getting there.
|
|
48
|
- Review Work Group Goals
- for the Five Year Experiment
- Next Chapters Community:
- Life Planning Program
- Meaningful Engagement Through Work and Service
- Continued Learning for New Directions
- Peer and Community Connections
|
|
49
|
- Community Partnerships for
- Senior Services
- Laura Capp
- cappl@elderaffairs.org
- Culture Change & Coaching Project
- Cathy Lieblich
- lieblicc@elderaffairs.org
- OTTER - Older Teachers Training
- Early Readers
- Jane Watkins
- jwatkins@fgpcfl.fdn.com
- Megan Duesterhaus
- mduesterhaus@fgpcfl.fdn.com
- Winter Park Public Library
- Lifelong Learning Institute
- Bob Melanson
- bmelanson@wppl.org
- Ruth Edwards
- redwards@wppl.org
- “Wisdom Works” Meaningful
- Service & Employment
- Randy Hunt
- sfceorhunt@yahoo.com
- Winter Park Health Foundation
- Paulette Geller
- pgeller@wphf.org
|
|
50
|
|