Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Institute for Community Collaborative Studies
California State University Monterey Bay

  • Evidence Based Aspects of the Matrix Model



  • Brad Richardson, Ph.D.
  • University of Iowa School of Social Work, National Resource Center for Family Centered Practice
  • &
  • Ellen Rodriguez
  • Broward County Family Success Center




  • June 16, 2005
2
UI SSW                                              NRC/FCP
3
National Resource Center for Family Centered Practice

  • About NRCFCP
  • Training
  • Research/Evaluation
  • Tech Assistance
  • Pubs Family Development Certification
  • Cultural Competency
  • DMC Resource Center
  • Latino Institute
  • Ask Doctors Outcome


  • www.uiowa.edu/~nrcfcp


4
National Resource Center for Family Centered Practice
University of Iowa School of Social Work

  • UI SSW                                                          NRC/FCP


5
Network Guide to Measuring Family Development Outcomes

  • Iowa – Automated Assessment of Family Progress (AAFP)
  • Illinois/Pennsylvania – [Bucks Co.] Family Self-Sufficiency Scale
  • Minnesota - Self Reliance Achievement Scale (SRAS)
  • Pennsylvania – ROMA Tracking System
  • Broward County Florida – Family Success/Family Development Model



6
The Matrix Model in Broward County Florida

  • Study Focus:


  • Program participant outcomes


  • Interagency Collaboration






7
Why Evaluate the Family Development Matrix Model?

  •   In addition to, are we achieving the outcomes?
        • How is our ability to tailor services
        • Has access increased
        • Are we including family and other supports
        • Have we enhanced ability to build on family and community strengths and resources
        • Sustained achievement of goals
        • Historical and baseline document & QA



8
Jumping the Gap


9
Service Delivery Innovations

  • Strength-based practice
    • Outcome evaluation


    • Family partnerships and cultural competence
    • Community Collaboration


    • Full continuum of flexible community-based services

10
Why Collaboration?
  • Single point of contact to insure continuity over time and coordination across agencies/programs


  • Access to specialized services and supports


  • Improved planning and service delivery due to cross agency and interdisciplinary expertise (consensus decision making)


  • Cost effective and less redundant


  • Outcomes for community






11
Mutual Benefit

  • The achievements of the collaborative are greater than the sum of the achievements of the partners


  • Common goals


  • All interventions may have merit


  • Evaluation can be used to understand successes and identify improvement areas
12
Assumption of Positive Intent

  • Assume Others* try as hard as you.


  • Assume Others* care as much as you.


  • Assume Others* manage money and resources as well as you.


  • Understand that solutions require joint activity not blame.


13
Others*
14
Beliefs And Values Pertaining To Families Must Be Re-evaluated Because…

  • Families have complex needs.
  • Children engage in provocative behaviors.
  • “Mental illness”
    • Diagnosis
    • Deficits
    • Pathology
    • Treatment
  • “Mental health”
    • State of being
    • Strength
    • Wellness
    • Support
15
Family Development Matrix

16
The Problem We Face…


17
We Must Change…
  • (








  • …especially relative to families and caring others beings involved.


18
What is Family Success?

19
Key Innovations
20
Fragmentation

        •  Listen to the Family’s situation.

        •  Restate what you have heard using Matrix indicators.

        •  Ask more questions to cover the Matrix categories.

        •  Score each category together.
21
Consequences of Misfit:
22
Why Family Development Works

23
Under-Serving & Over-Serving


24
Individualized & Strength-Based
25
Individualized & Strength-Based Service Delivery


26
Individualized, Strength-Based, Family-Focused Service Delivery


27
 


28
 


29
 



30
 



31
 


32
 

33
 
34
"Really know the family"
  • Really know the family


  • Really know the caring others


  • Holistic


  • Acknowledge, respect and admire achievements


  • Recognize where they have been, how they got there, and where they are going


35
 


36
 



37
Strengths Discovery


38
 



39
 
40
 
41
 


42
 


43
"Matrix records (statistical analysis..."
  • Matrix records (statistical analysis of quantitative data).
  • Interviews with Clients (group, individual & telephone follow-ups).
  • Face-to-face interviews with staff & administrators (group and individual).
  • Face-to-face interviews with providers (individual and group).
  • Community collaboration survey of providers (in person, fax, group).


44
"Jerry Endres"

      •  Jerry Endres,  Principal Investigator


      •  Brad Richardson, Co-Principal Investigator


      •  Judi Sherman, Co-Investigator


      •  Funding by the Packard Foundation

45
 


46
 


47
 


48
 


49
 


50
 


51
"Program Philosophy is a meaningful..."
  • Program Philosophy is a meaningful change from Previous Model


  • New philosophy influences interaction with families


  • Practice learned at training, then coworkers


  • Staff value helpfulness of staff, matrix model and focus on strengths, reputation as program
52
"Less paperwork"
  • Less paperwork


  • Better facility


  • More time to communicate among staff
53
"FSC has gone from a..."
  • FSC has gone from a “band aid” approach to a longer term family capacity building model.


  • More referrals are being made to FSC.


  • FSC is being used as a place to start.
  •  Provider Wish List - Would like to see more communication & coordination of services for each family  +   see thousand points of verbatims.


54
 
55
 


56
 


57
"THINGS TO CONSIDER"


  • THINGS TO CONSIDER…
58
Summary of Findings
  • Program Participant Goals Achieved


  • Outcomes measures showed significant positive change


  • Satisfaction improved: Participants + Staff, Providers


  • Community Collaboration Improved


  • Start-up was 2 ˝ years ago



59
Recommendations
  • 1. Measure Tx Fidelity + Matrix Outcomes
  •        (QA, CQI…)
  • 2. Use results to guide decisions (fine tuning)
  • 3. Assessment of sustainability requires
  •        predictive validity
  • 4. Improved locator information needed
  • 5. Operate within capacity
  • 6. Further research and analysis
60
Dilbert
61
Capacity and Outcomes
62
WEB SITE RESOURCES

  • uiowa.edu/~nrcfcp National Resource Center for Family Centered Practice (DMC Resource Center)
  • paperboat.com John Franz and Pat Miles; articles and slide presentations about WA
  • mentalhealth.org/child SAMHSA Nat’l Mental Health Initiative
  • air-dc.org/cecp Center for Effective Collaboration Practice
  • ffcmh.org Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health
  • wbgh.com National Resource Network on Children and Family Mental Health Services
  • dml.georgetown.edu National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health
  • fmhi.usf.edu Florida Research and Training Center on Children’s Mental Health
  • rtc.pdx.edu Portland Oregon Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health